Party like it’s 1624

In trying to learn (and learn about) the Bach Chaconne, I’m facing a struggle that’s familiar from trying to learn about jazz. The chaconne is a dance form originating in the Americas, or among African people who were brought to the Americas. Spanish and Portuguese colonists brought the chaconne to Europe in the early 1600s, where it became a wildly popular dance. Over time, composers of “art” music got interested in it too, and they used it as the basis for an entire genre of increasingly abstracted compositions. By the time Bach wrote the chaconne in his Partita for Violin No. 2, he was referring to an abstraction of an abstraction of an abstraction, something like a John Coltrane arrangement of a pop standard. It makes me wonder what a chaconne might have sounded like in its original context. Bach’s (and Coltrane’s) abstractions are wonderful in and of themselves, but you can’t fully appreciate them without understanding what they’re referring back to.

It’s easy to listen to Coltrane’s source material. If you try to do the same with for Bach, however, you have a harder time. When you do a Google search for chaconnes, you mostly find performances of Bach, or similarly abstracted works by other canonical composers. Thanks to Wikipedia, though, I did find a chaconne of the kind that a person might have actually danced to back in 17th century Spain. It’s a tune by Juan Arañés called “A La Vida Bona.” Here’s a performance by Piffaro, The Renaissance Band.

Now that sounds like dance music! Arañés wrote the tune to be sung by a chorus accompanied by guitar, like so:

I like the Piffaro version better, for its percussion, its danceable vibe, and its cheerful Renaissance woodwinds. Like any good dance tune, it’s rhythmically interesting and harmonically boring, mostly I-IV-V progressions in F-sharp. The only surprising chord movement happens in two spots, here for example, when the tune lands briefly on D-sharp major. It’s like a standard movement to the relative minor, but with the parallel major VI chord instead. This chord progression sounds familiar to me, it’s a Renaissance trope that I’m sure I’ve heard before. However, I have no idea what it’s called. Is it a kind of Picardy third? If someone could enlighten me in the comments, I’d appreciate it.

Anyway, the real excitement in the Piffaro recording is its groove. It’s infectious, but very different from the music we’re dancing to now. The chaconne is in triple meter, but it doesn’t sound like a waltz. I can’t help but hear it the chaconne groove as 4/4 with phrases in groups of three bars. If the chaconne groove really is African in origin, then that duple/triple ambiguity was probably intentional. People in Sub-Saharan Africa love twelve-beat cycles because you can divide them into three-beat or four-beat groupings equally easily, and you’re supposed to hear both groupings simultaneously.

Here’s a chaconne written around the same time as the Arañes one, by Francesca Caccini. It has some nifty triplets and dissonances in it.

Here’s another chaconne by Andrea Falconieri from a little later. You can hear the rhythm getting abstracted away from the basic chaconne groove.

Alex Ross calls the chaconne a “sexily swirling dance.” The examples that I can find of people dancing to it are more courtly than sexy or swirling. They dance one in episode four of The Borgias, which is anachronistic, but it gives you the idea. Here’s a not-very-sexy performance from YouTube:

I continue to struggle to aurally connect the rhythms of this dance to the rhythms of chaconnes by Bach and other Northern European composers. Alex Ross talks about the Lully chaconne from Phaeton as being a paradigmatic example of the chaconne genre. Harmonically and formally, Lully’s piece might descend from the folkloric chaconne, but aside from a mildly accented beat two, its rhythms are indistinguishable from plain old waltz time.

Various musicological sources describe a “Chaconne rhythm” common to the genre:

Here’s the chaconne rhythm on the Groove Pizza – the snare is playing the pattern, while the kick and hi-hat are doing generic accompaniment.

You can clap the chaconne rhythm along with any of the music in this post. You can even clap it over the opening bars of the Bach Chaconne, though you have to do it extremely slowly. However, the relationship between the groove in the Piffaro recording and the “chaconne rhythm” is mysterious to me. Did Piffaro invent their groove, or did they get it from some historical or folkloric source? I can’t find an answer online or in the library.

Northern European composers did not seem overly concerned with representing Iberian dances correctly. Spanish colonists brought another triple-meter dance back to Europe from the Americas called the sarabande. Canonical composers used the words “chaconne” and “sarabande” interchangeably. For example, the Handel Sarabande uses the literal chaconne rhythm all the way through.

Eighteenth century white guys mixed up the sarabande and chaconne with other “racy” Southern dances too, like the Italian passacaglia. Bach himself freely interchanged the words “chaconne” and “passacaglia.”

Based on what I can piece together, I’m sensing a narrative: Iberian colonists hear a West African and/or Native American rhythm and like it. They learn to play it, or an approximation of it, and they bring it home, where it’s received as a “saucy,” “sexy,” “primitive” dance. The rhythm takes on a life of its own independent of its cultural origins. Higher-class people adopt it, and sand off its edges. Then the “serious” composers start adapt the simplified version into the abstractions we know from the classical canon. In the process, the rhythms lose their idiosyncrasies, and get mushed together into a vague sense of “sexiness.”

There’s a parallel to the way that white musicians currently describe any Latin-sounding beat as “salsa” or “mambo” or “bossa”, without realizing that these rhythms are all different from each other. I’m also guessing that it’s a similar story to the evolution of “Kumbaya” from the syncopated groove of the Gullah original to the foursquare version we all learned from Joan Baez. The steady appropriation of “lowbrow” dance musics originating in the African diaspora into “highbrow” art music is evidently many hundreds of years older than I thought.

My preferred tool for musicological investigation is the remix. Here’s a version of the Piffaro recording with some present-day dance beats: techno four-on-the-floor from a 909 and the James Brown “Yeah Woo” break. Enjoy.

Mostly unrelated, but: how cool is Baroque dance notation? I can’t say the dancing itself does much for me, but I love looking at these diagrams.

Hear all of my classical remixes.

See also: a deep dive into the Bach Chaconne.

Update! Helen De Cruz has some more examples of chaconnes played in a dance style.

2 replies on “Party like it’s 1624”

  1. This is something that’s been discussed quite a bit in musicology and unfortunately I don’t think you’ll find the answer you want, there’s just too many gaps in the records. If you look at the first mentions we know of the zarabanda in the 16th century it’s clear that it’s something that’s been around for a while, and same with the chacona. Added to that, nobody writing about them seemed at all concerned with distinguishing between them and a number of other dances with some seeming connection to Mexico and other American colonies. I believe the Arañés piece is still one of the first pieces to use the term chacona and even that is decades after the first written mentions. So is the piece and accurate representation? Setting aside any messy questions of authenticity, I think we’re simply too far removed to ever be able find an answer. Two quick articles about the history to look at would be Robert Stevenson’s “The First Dated Mention of the Sarabande” and Thomas Walker’s “Ciaccona and Passacaglia: Remarks on Their Origin and Early History” (Both on JSTOR)

    As for your question about the Piffaro recording, to my knowledge there’s no source that would totally account for their arrangement. The Arañés guitar tablature is pretty spare (like most baroque guitar notation), and of course doesn’t mention any percussion. So the strumming patterns and percussion additions probably come from a mix of: the written descriptions (lively, castanets, etc..), later baroque guitar books like those by Gaspar Sanz or Santiago de Murcia that go into some detail about how to embellish chords with rasgueado techniques, possibly some still living traditions like flamenco that have some common lineage, and finally intuitive musicianship. Of course I’d also suggest just asking them, in my experience Early Music people love talking about their approaches to performance.

    I think your account of the rhythmic idiosyncrasies being sanded down is probably accurate. By Bach’s time it seems like the only constant distinction between the chaconne and the sarabande for example is in the formal structure rather than rhythm. I’ve read plenty of arguments otherwise so I’m sure there are some Baroque music experts who would take issue with that, but I just don’t see it in the music. It seems to me if any particular group of 17th-18th century musicians ever had more nuanced ideas of what makes the rhythm of a sarabande universally different from a chaconne (or different from a passacaglia), those nuances were transmitted orally and are no longer recoverable.

    Lastly, I would agree that a lot of the neglect comes from simply not being as concerned with rhythm (though it’s also worth taking into account how difficult it is to capture rhythmic nuance in notation), but I’d wouldn’t be so quick to frame it as a purely ‘African vs European’ tension. The Catholic church’s concern with rhythm in music (and music that’s vulgar and bad for you vs sacred and good for you) goes back a long time, well before Europe had any serious contact with Sub-Saharan Africa and certainly before there was an African diaspora. For example there was a papal bull in 1324 prohibiting the very rhythmically sophisticated polyphony that had been developing over the previous century. If you’re at all interested reading about that I’d recommend reading Rob Wegmans article “What is Counterpoint?” (https://www.academia.edu/3445739/What_Is_Counterpoint), I think it does a great job of uncovering a lot of often missed but deeply rooted assumptions in how music in the European tradition is valued. The effects of all of that have been extremely long lived and certainly affected how European musicians saw other forms of music long after the Catholic church was in control. You see the same kind of watering down (or ‘compromise’ more generously) of rhythm a lot in the 19th century with composers appropriating European folk music like Grieg in his piano pieces taken from Hardingfele tunes or Bartok’s many transcriptions from Hungarian and other Eastern European folk traditions.

Comments are closed.